Blog

Asia’s Regional Tax Wars Indicate That It’s Time to Review Tax Incentives

Sakshi Rai

  • 22 September 2017
  • The Wire
  • 0 Comments

Tiny URL x

http://bit.ly/2fmR4Xj



Revelations like the Panama PapersBahamas leaks and the recent Azerbaijani Laundromat scandal have seen countries adopting “global” transparency standards endorsed by the OECD and G20. Asian countries like Indonesia, India, Hong Kong, Singapore and China have agreed to bilaterally share financial information of taxpayers in the beginning of 2018 to combat corporate tax avoidance.

Understanding the problem

Substantial domestic revenue is lost by countries globally as a result of corporate tax dodging practices. Multinational corporations (MNCs) use aggressive tax minimisation strategies to shift their profits to a low tax jurisdiction. This loss of domestic revenues has severe implications on endeavours to safeguard human rights, macroeconomic policies, public institutions and the socio-political economic stability of a country. As per UNCTAD estimates, developing countries lose $100 billion annually as a result of corporate tax avoidance practices. Revenue loss in developing countries as a result of corporate tax avoidance is $200 billion annually, according to an IMF working paper. Clearly, due to their limited fiscal space developing countries are the most affected by the use of such practices.

Almost 70% of world trade occurs via MNCs, many with subsidiaries in tax havens. Low or no corporate income tax jurisdictions, a common feature of tax havens, allow entities to flout taxation laws of other jurisdictions. Tax havens also facilitate and maintain global financial secrecy by offering lucrative schemes, arrangements and services to multinational entities. Nearly 1.6% of total global wealth is held as offshore financial assets.

Governments of developed countries have been accused of orchestrating crafty deals with poor countries to reduce corporate taxes for foreign investment. Developing countries also look to improve the ‘ease of doing business’ for corporates in this regard. Ideally, exemptions or breaks on taxes are allocated in a particular sector to drive more investment in that field. In hopes of creating a favourable corporate climate for foreign investors and with an aim to generate employment as a spillover, developing countries offer massive tax exemptions or holidays to businesses. The costs of offering such exemptions or holidays have shown to outweigh the expected gains, often at the expense of jeopardising the tax base of developing countries. This not only opens the possibilities for illicit financial outflows but also methodical round tripping of funds from tax havens to developing countries.

Furthermore, the process of allocating tax breaks by governments to businesses and MNCs is rather opaque and secretive. As economic barriers on capital movement are being lifted, regionally, the use of such harmful practices has culminated in intense regional competition, also known as a ‘race to the bottom’. In fact, small and local businesses end up paying more in taxes due to artificial tax competition. Rising corporate tax competition has built immense pressure on southern countries that are truly dependent on big businesses.

Asia’s context

Post 1980s, many Asian countries adopted open market and liberalisation reforms. Despite being the fastest development region, governments of Asian countries are increasingly faced with the challenge of raising their public revenue. With the exception of Japan and Korea, tax-GDP ratios for the majority of Asia-Pacific countries are around or below 18%, considered to be lowest in the world. In order to expand domestic tax collections, governments impose indirect taxes on consumption (like GST, VAT etc.). Indirect taxes ignore a person’s ability to pay taxes and hurt the most vulnerable sections of the society.

Owing to such policies, the progressivity in taxes has effectively declined and has led to gross levels of income and wealth inequality. More than half of the total wealth pool is owned by the top 1% in countries like Indonesia, India, Russia and Thailand.  In Philippines, preferential tax treatment led to a revenue loss of close to 80 billion PhP in the year 2009 alone. Cobham and Jansky’s paper estimates an emerging economy like India has lost close to $41.7 billion due to tax avoidance by corporates.

Moreover, the process of allocating tax incentives seldom involves periodic monitoring assessment and review processes. Many Asian countries like Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Indonesia and the Philippines offer reduced corporate tax rates to attract foreign direct investment. Meanwhile, an offshore financial centre like Singapore allows businesses to negotiate the years of a tax holiday a business can claim. Foreign round tripped capital from tax havens without appropriate regulation poses higher risks of transfer mis-pricing causing a larger drain of resources from that developing country. Tax havens like Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore have substituted more conventional tax havens like Switzerland as suitable destinations for parking offshore wealth.

Building tax transparency

A well-resourced taxation system serves to fulfill the redistributive demands of an economy – a marker of a healthy society. Artificial corporate tax competition precisely works to undermine this. Low income countries fail to raise adequate tax revenues due to weak laws and under-resourced departments. The deteriorating status of state driven investment in social sectors is an inevitable consequence of extensive corporate tax competition. The loopholes in global finance remain a deterrent to the themes of domestic resource mobilisation and discussions on financing the post 2015 development agenda.

Nationally, governments need to place regular monitoring mechanisms to evaluate tax breaks offered to corporates to check any tax incentive abuse. Additionally, public reporting of financial information on profits, losses, revenue accrued, number of employees etc. of MNCs on a country-by-country basis annually will allow governments to tax the arm of the MNC in that country and prevent shifting of profits to tax havens.

Asian countries must take steps to rationalise tax competition and build cooperation on tax matters at the regional as well as the global level. The role of regional cooperation in mobilising reforms to bridge gaps in the international taxation system can no longer be ignored.

Civil society, globally, has advocated for the realisation of development from a rights based lens through progressive fiscal policies and a fair and transparent global tax system that works for everyone. In this regard, southern countries have advocated for an intergovernmental global tax body under the auspices of the United Nations that will give all countries an equal and democratic platform to debate and negotiate policies that directly affect them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*